Lion Creek Crossings IV
6951 Lion Way Apt 411
Browse 82 Public Housing development records in California, organized by city. Confirm current operation, responsible PHA, eligibility, and waitlist status with the agency.
HUD source-data date: not recorded. Data compilation and directory sync dates are not the HUD observation date.
Sources: HUD, USDA Rural Development, HUD LIHTC Database. See HUD's Public Housing Occupancy Guidebook and utility allowance guidance.
This preliminary check is not an eligibility decision. Confirm rules with the administering agency.
Public Housing developments are administered by local Public Housing Agencies (PHAs). Income limits, annual admission targeting, local preferences, rent calculations, and application procedures vary under federal rules and local PHA policies. Use HUD's PHA directory to identify and confirm the agency responsible for a development. Any HUD-reported wait-time figure on a property page is a historical average among admissions, not a current wait estimate.
6951 Lion Way Apt 411
930 66th Ave
1269 66th Ave
1350 7th St
6403 Fenham St
1029 Kirkham St
11 properties
View income and AMI reference data for Los Angeles1461 Dana St
2082 E 114th St
1413 E 109th St
11415 Zamora Ave
1725 E 53rd St
201 E Elmyra St
2515 Kit Carson St
1725 K St
7280 Mandy Dr
2845 37th St
3520 41st Ave
480 Redwood Ave
1201 Felicia Ct
1210 E Colonia Rd
1361 Althea Ct
801 S C St
401 S C St
5111 Squires Dr
640 E Cesar Chavez Blvd
5161 E Kings Canyon Rd Apt 121
2086 N Fresno St
418 S Modoc St
939 W California Ave
7995 Telephone Rd
8806 N Bank Dr
1216 E Santa Clara St
254 W Barnett St
HUD Small Area Fair Market Rents (SAFMR) are rental benchmarks used in housing programs; they do not set each voucher household's payment standard across California (CA). Across 49 HUD FMR areas and 82 listed communities in California (5,101 LIHTC tax credit, 1,221 Project-Based Section 8, 721 Section 202 senior, 513 USDA Rural Development), the property-location-weighted Fair Market Rent summary is $2,110/month for a 1-bedroom and $2,599/month for a 2-bedroom. Local Public Housing Agencies set their own voucher payment standards. The 90%–110% figures below are illustrative calculations from FMR, not guaranteed or official local payment standards.
| Unit Size | Illustrative 90% of FMR | Property-location-weighted FMR | Illustrative 110% of FMR | CA ZIP FMR Range (Min – Max) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Studio / Efficiency | $1,731/mo | $1,924/mo | $2,116/mo | $740 – $3,950/mo |
| 1 Bedroom | $1,899/mo | $2,110/mo | $2,321/mo | $820 – $4,140/mo |
| 2 Bedroom | $2,339/mo | $2,599/mo | $2,858/mo | $1,070 – $5,230/mo |
| 3 Bedroom | $3,070/mo | $3,411/mo | $3,752/mo | $1,460 – $6,670/mo |
| 4 Bedroom | $3,502/mo | $3,892/mo | $4,281/mo | $1,540 – $7,720/mo |
Source: HUD Small Area Fair Market Rents (SAFMR). Geography: property ZIP-code locations in California. Dataset year: not recorded in the local FMR table. The 90% and 110% columns are illustrative calculations; local PHAs set their own voucher payment standards.
| HUD Metro / FMR Area | Studio | 1 BR | 2 BR | 3 BR | 4 BR | HUD 4-Person Median Family Income | HUD fiscal year | Properties |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA HUD Metro FMR Area215 ZIPs | $2,057 | $2,301 | $2,867 | $3,641 | $4,061 | $118,826 | FY2026 | 1,506 |
| Oakland-Fremont, CA HUD Metro FMR Area69 ZIPs | $2,099 | $2,347 | $2,863 | $3,660 | $4,341 | $165,195 | FY2026 | 532 |
| San Francisco, CA HUD Metro FMR Area61 ZIPs | $2,398 | $2,889 | $3,481 | $4,431 | $4,623 | $191,664 | FY2026 | 423 |
| San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA MSA58 ZIPs | $2,390 | $2,568 | $3,134 | $4,175 | $5,060 | $130,546 | FY2026 | 403 |
| Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA MSA82 ZIPs | $1,734 | $1,816 | $2,255 | $2,998 | $3,632 | $97,585 | FY2026 | 397 |
| San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA HUD Metro FMR Area47 ZIPs | $2,479 | $2,808 | $3,292 | $4,352 | $4,734 | $191,327 | FY2026 | 360 |
| Sacramento--Roseville--Arden-Arcade, CA HUD Metro FMR Area57 ZIPs | $1,792 | $1,878 | $2,315 | $3,086 | $3,562 | $123,071 | FY2026 | 342 |
| Fresno, CA HUD Metro FMR Area38 ZIPs | $1,263 | $1,274 | $1,568 | $2,177 | $2,505 | $83,008 | FY2026 | 257 |
| Santa Ana-Anaheim-Irvine, CA HUD Metro FMR Area62 ZIPs | $2,628 | $2,692 | $3,173 | $4,307 | $5,143 | $146,648 | FY2026 | 238 |
| Bakersfield-Delano, CA MSA26 ZIPs | $1,116 | $1,138 | $1,469 | $2,022 | $2,416 | $72,991 | FY2026 | 200 |
| Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA MSA17 ZIPs | $1,975 | $2,222 | $2,653 | $3,591 | $4,166 | $125,016 | FY2026 | 124 |
| Salinas, CA MSA16 ZIPs | $2,300 | $2,369 | $2,880 | $3,839 | $4,151 | $109,578 | FY2026 | 116 |
Source: HUD User Income Limits and HUD SAFMR. Each row is a HUD area represented by listed property locations; the displayed HUD fiscal year is the latest available for that area. HUD income limits are reference data and do not establish official LIHTC/MTSP limits.
| Property-Location-Weighted Indicator | California Property-Location Summary |
|---|---|
| Median gross rent (U.S. Census ACS) | $1,813/mo |
| Property-location-weighted 2-Bedroom HUD Fair Market Rent (SAFMR) | $2,599/mo |
| Estimated property-location-weighted 4-person income benchmark | $105,759/yr |
| Median household income (Census ACS) | $87,946/yr |
| Renter-occupied housing share | 51.8% |
| Cost-burdened renters (spending 30%+ of income on rent) | 54.9% |
| Severely cost-burdened renters (spending 50%+ of income on rent) | 28.2% |
Source: U.S. Census ACS 5-year ZIP-code data and HUD SAFMR. Geography: ZIP-code locations represented by listed properties in California. Dataset year: not recorded or mixed in the local data. The summary is property-location-weighted and is not an official statewide qualification limit.
Methodology: Fair Market Rent benchmarks are summarized from HUD Small Area Fair Market Rents (SAFMR), HUD income limits by their latest available fiscal year, and U.S. Census ACS 5-year ZIP-code estimates across represented property locations in California. The local dataset does not record an FMR year. Local Public Housing Agencies (PHAs) establish their own payment standards; the 90%–110% figures are illustrative calculations only.